Understanding RTI Act, 2005 and Its Limits Under DPDP, 2023

📢 Introduction

The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) 🏛️ has been a cornerstone of transparency and accountability in India, empowering citizens to question the government. However, the newly enacted Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act) 🛡️ significantly undermines this right by prioritizing data privacy over public interest.

This imbalance threatens democratic governance, shielding public officials from scrutiny and weakening citizens’ ability to expose corruption. 🚨

“Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.”Justice Louis Brandeis

⚖️ Key Features of RTI Act, 2005 vs. DPDP Act, 2023

1️⃣ Dilution of Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act 📃

Under RTI, personal information could be disclosed if public interest outweighed privacy concerns. The DPDP Act’s Section 44(3) expands the definition of protected personal data, making it easier for authorities to deny RTI requests outright. ❌

📝 Legal Maxim: Salus populi suprema lex esto (The welfare of the people shall be the supreme law).

👨‍⚖️ Case Reference: R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994), where the Supreme Court upheld the right to access public information, emphasizing that public officials’ conduct must be open to scrutiny.

2️⃣ Excessive Power to the Government 🏢

While RTI ensures public authorities justify withholding information, the DPDP Act allows the government unchecked discretion to reject RTI requests citing data protection concerns, even in cases of corruption or misuse of public funds. ⚠️

🔎 Doctrine of Transparency: The Supreme Court in Central Public Information Officer v. Subhash Chandra Aggarwal (2019) ruled that the office of the Chief Justice falls under RTI, reinforcing that public institutions must remain open to scrutiny.

3️⃣ Shielding Bureaucrats and Public Officials 🕵️‍♂️

RTI has played a vital role in exposing misuse of power, but the DPDP Act restricts access to details like salaries, transfers, disciplinary actions, previously accessible under RTI. This protects corrupt officials from public accountability. 😡

⚖️ Significance in Democracy: “A democracy without transparency is like a body without a soul.”

4️⃣ Impact on Whistleblowers and Investigative Journalism 📰

RTI has been instrumental in exposing major scams 🏗️ (e.g., Adarsh Housing Scam, Commonwealth Games Scam). The DPDP Act’s broad interpretation of personal data restricts access to crucial information, making it difficult for journalists and activists to uncover wrongdoings.

👩‍⚖️ Case Reference: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2003) emphasized that right to information is integral to free speech under Article 19(1)(a).

5️⃣ Contradiction in Legislative Intent ⚖️

While RTI was enacted to empower citizens, the DPDP Act prioritizes data secrecy over transparency. A democracy thrives when the government is answerable to its people, and the DPDP Act tilts the balance in favor of opacity.

🌎 Relevance in Today’s Society

📌 In the digital age, information is power. Restricting public access under the pretext of privacy can lead to:

✅ Increased corruption 💰

✅ Less accountability from officials 🏛️

Weakening of democracy 🏴

⚖️ Way Forward: The government must strike a balance ⚖️ between data privacy and transparency by:

🔹 Amending the DPDP Act to ensure public interest exemptions

🔹 Strengthening judicial review over RTI denials

🔹 Creating an independent oversight body 🏛️

📌 Conclusion

The RTI Act promotes transparency, while the DPDP Act fosters secrecy. The unchecked rejection of RTI requests under the guise of privacy threatens the core of democratic governance. Unless the DPDP Act is amended, it risks becoming a shield for corruption rather than a safeguard for privacy. 🔥

💬 What are your thoughts on this issue? Should privacy override the right to information? Let’s discuss in the comments! 💡👇

#RightToKnow #DigitalPrivacyVsTransparency #DataSecrecyThreat #RTIUnderSiege #DemocracyAtRisk #KnowYourRights #AccountabilityMatters #WhistleblowerProtection #RightToKnowNow #RTIUnderThreat #SaveDemocracy


Discover more from Dr. Ganesh Visavale

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 Comments

    1. An RTI application can be rejected if it seeks information exempted under Section 8 (e.g., national security, trade secrets, personal privacy, ongoing investigations) or if it is frivolous, vague, or voluminous, causing disproportionate diversion of resources under Section 7(9).

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Is dpdp already in use or going to be implementing? Is that act same rti? The can take an action immediately to solve the public grievance?

    Like

  2. Thanks for highlights the DPDP Act. This act is motivated or save the skin of politicians . By introducing this act RTI 2005 will lost its shine and faith of people’s. RTI Act 2005 न्याय की मूर्ति की तरह है ।

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.